Zapier vs Make
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, ease of use, integrations, and which tool wins for your business.
Zapier
Connect your apps and automate workflows
9
AppAdvize Score /10
Higher ratedMake
Visual automation for complex workflows
8.8
AppAdvize Score /10
Short answer
Zapier vs Make — Zapier edges ahead slightly: 9/10 vs 8.8/10. Zapier is the better pick for anyone connecting 2–3 apps with simple automations, while Make suits agencies building automations for clients better. Both offer free plans.
Score Comparison
Pricing
Zapier
Pros
- ✓6,000+ app integrations — widest selection available
- ✓No code required
- ✓Fast to set up
- ✓Generous free tier for simple automations
Cons
- ✗Gets expensive at high task volumes
- ✗Multi-step automations require paid plan
- ✗Make.com is cheaper for complex workflows
Make
Pros
- ✓Much cheaper than Zapier at scale
- ✓Visual canvas makes complex flows easier to understand
- ✓Handles complex conditional logic well
- ✓Generous free tier
Cons
- ✗Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- ✗Fewer native integrations (though still 1,500+)
- ✗Error handling is less friendly for beginners
Who Should Use Each
Choose Zapier if…
- • Anyone connecting 2–3 apps with simple automations
- • Non-technical users
Choose Make if…
- • Agencies building automations for clients
- • Power users with complex workflows
Bottom Line
Zapier is our pick for most users.
Zapier scores higher overall (9/10 vs 8.8/10) and leads on Ease of Use and Integrations. It's the stronger choice if you anyone connecting 2–3 apps with simple automations.
Choose Zapier if…
- →Anyone connecting 2–3 apps with simple automations
- →Non-technical users
Choose Make if…
- →Agencies building automations for clients
- →Power users with complex workflows
Not sure which tool?
Get a personalized automation recommendation
Six questions and we'll match you to the tools that actually fit your business, budget, and team size.